<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religion: noses out of UK science, please.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lunartalks.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/religion-noses-out-of-uk-science-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lunartalks.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/religion-noses-out-of-uk-science-please/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Religion: noses out of science please (2). &#171; lunartalks</title>
		<link>http://lunartalks.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/religion-noses-out-of-uk-science-please/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>Religion: noses out of science please (2). &#171; lunartalks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunartalks.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/religion-noses-out-of-uk-science-please/#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>[...] Lords have tried in a series of amendments to stop, slow or dilute the provisions in the Bill. (Religion: noses out of science, please)  Reading the debates, they all seem to have been defeated.  So now the Catholic Cabinet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lords have tried in a series of amendments to stop, slow or dilute the provisions in the Bill. (Religion: noses out of science, please)  Reading the debates, they all seem to have been defeated.  So now the Catholic Cabinet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Carter</title>
		<link>http://lunartalks.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/religion-noses-out-of-uk-science-please/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lunartalks.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/religion-noses-out-of-uk-science-please/#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>Oops! I initially misread the first few paragraphs of this post to be saying that Warnock was in favour of this commission - which didn't make sense, as she is usually an extremely sensible baroness. Glad to see it was me being stupid, not her.

You're right, Baroness Warnock does indeed rock a fat one. She's cooler than the Fonz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I initially misread the first few paragraphs of this post to be saying that Warnock was in favour of this commission - which didn&#8217;t make sense, as she is usually an extremely sensible baroness. Glad to see it was me being stupid, not her.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, Baroness Warnock does indeed rock a fat one. She&#8217;s cooler than the Fonz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
